rust-lang / rust-lang/rust

Tracking Issue for extern "rust-preserve-none" ABI (feature `rust_preserve_none_cc`)

Open
#151,401 4 comments 3 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

C-tracking-issue T-compiler
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
119k
Forks
16.1k
PR merge metrics
PR metrics pending

Description

This is a tracking issue for the experimental rust_preserve_none_cc added without RFC process.
The feature gate for the issue is #![feature(rust_preserve_none_cc)].

This feature is relatively closely related to rust_cold_cc of which this is a conceptual inverse.

About tracking issues

Tracking issues are used to record the overall progress of implementation.
They are also used as hubs connecting to other relevant issues, e.g., bugs or open design questions.
A tracking issue is however not meant for large scale discussion, questions, or bug reports about a feature.
Instead, open a dedicated issue for the specific matter and add the relevant feature gate label.
Discussion comments will get marked as off-topic or deleted.
Repeated discussions on the tracking issue may lead to the tracking issue getting locked.

Steps
Unresolved Questions
  • What guarantees should we provide? My initial suggestion is that this is entirely an optimization hint and it should be fine to fall-back to regular Rust calling convention for backends that do not support this calling convention.
  • How can we make using this compatible with mixing codegen backends – particularly in the context of using an LLVM-compiled standard library with a cranelift-compiled binary or tests?
Implementation history

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the implementation PR #151065 and the rust_preserve_none_cc feature gate. Review the rustc-dev-guide stabilization and documentation instructions, then consider the unresolved questions about guarantees and mixed codegen backends. Done requires the documentation, style decisions, and stabilization PR to be completed.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
compilers
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
30/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.