rust-lang / rust-lang/rust

Tracking Issue for `darwin_objc`

Open
#145,496 4 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

A-codegen A-linkage C-tracking-issue F-darwin_objc I-lang-radar O-apple T-compiler T-lang
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
119k
Forks
16.1k
PR merge metrics
PR metrics pending

Description

The feature gate for the issue is #![feature(darwin_objc)].

This feature makes it possible to reference Objective-C classes and selectors using the same ABI used by native Objective-C on Apple/Darwin platforms. Without it, Rust code interacting with Objective-C must resort to loading classes and selectors using costly string-based lookups at runtime. With it, these references can be loaded efficiently at dynamic load time.

About tracking issues

Tracking issues are used to record the overall progress of implementation.
They are also used as hubs connecting to other relevant issues, e.g., bugs or open design questions.
A tracking issue is however not meant for large scale discussion, questions, or bug reports about a feature.
Instead, open a dedicated issue for the specific matter and add the relevant feature gate label.
Discussion comments will get marked as off-topic or deleted.
Repeated discussions on the tracking issue may lead to the tracking issue getting locked.

Steps
Unresolved Questions
  • Is core::ffi::darwin::objc the module this should this live in?
  • Should we remove no_dead_strip, to allow the selectors to be stripped if unused? CC https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/114111.
  • How do we support more complex use-cases (weak classes, raw-dylib)?
  • What about protocol references, and constant CFString? These need somewhat similar compiler support.
  • Should this be a pure language feature instead? (e.g. remove the std parts, and only expose it as a built-in attribute on statics).
Implementation history

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the linked summary and the original issue, then review the completed implementation PR #145660 and the unresolved questions. The remaining work is to coordinate an API, update documentation, complete a stabilization PR, and propose FCP; done means those tracking steps are resolved and the listed design questions have decisions.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
objective-c, rust
Domain
compilers
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.