Strange type inference for recursive RPIT
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 119k
- Forks
- 16.2k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
I tried this code:
#![allow(unconditional_recursion)]
fn what1<T>(x: T) -> impl Sized {
what1(x)
}
fn what2<T>(x: T) -> impl Sized {
what2(what2(x))
}
fn print_return_type<T, U>(_: impl Fn(T) -> U) {
println!("{}", std::any::type_name::<U>())
}
fn main() {
print_return_type(what1::<i32>);
print_return_type(what2::<i32>);
}
I compiled the above code in edition 2024, and got the output:
()
i32
Also, the following code gives a compile error:
#![allow(unconditional_recursion)]
fn what3<T>(x: T) -> impl Sized {
what3(what3(what3(x)))
}
error[E0792]: expected generic type parameter, found `impl Sized`
--> src/lib.rs:4:5
|
3 | fn what3<T>(x: T) -> impl Sized {
| - this generic parameter must be used with a generic type parameter
4 | what3(what3(what3(x)))
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0792`.
(See also #139350)
I think that both what1 and what2 should not compile, but I'm not sure. And if it does compiles, they should both return !. However, they return () and i32, respectively. (This happens despite the edition 2024 never type fallback change.) The current behavior doesn't make any sense to me.
Discovered while experimenting with #139402.
@rustbot labels +A-impl-trait
Meta
Reproducible on the playground with nightly rust 1.88.0-nightly (2025-04-04 17ffbc81a30c09419383)
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the src/lib.rs reproducer on the referenced nightly compiler and compare the inferred return types of what1, what2, and what3, including the E0792 diagnostic. Read the discussion in #139350 and the related context from #139402, then determine the intended recursive RPIT and never-type-fallback behavior. Done means the behavior is resolved or clearly specified with regression coverage.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 38/100