Tracking Issue for ByteStr/ByteString
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 119k
- Forks
- 16.1k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Feature gate: #![feature(bstr)]
This is a tracking issue for the ByteStr/ByteString types, which represent human-readable strings that are usually, but not always, UTF-8. Unlike &str/String, these types permit non-UTF-8 contents, making them suitable for user input, non-native filenames (as Path only supports native filenames), and other applications that need to round-trip whatever data the user provides.
This was approved in ACP https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/502 .
Public API
// In core::bstr
#[repr(transparent)]
pub struct ByteStr(pub [u8]);
impl ByteStr {
pub fn new<B: ?Sized + AsRef<[u8]>>(bytes: &B) -> &Self { ... }
}
impl Debug for ByteStr { ... }
impl Display for ByteStr { ... }
impl Deref for ByteStr { type Target = [u8]; ... }
impl DerefMut for ByteStr { ... }
// Other trait impls from bstr, including From impls
// In alloc::bstr
#[repr(transparent)]
pub struct ByteString(pub Vec<u8>);
impl Debug for ByteString { ... }
impl Display for ByteString { ... }
impl Deref for ByteString { type Target = Vec<u8>; ... }
impl DerefMut for ByteString { ... }
// Other trait impls from bstr, including From impls
Steps / History
- Implementation: #135073
- Final comment period (FCP)^1
- Stabilization PR
Unresolved Questions
- Should we call this
BStr/BString, orByteStr/ByteString? The former will be more familiar to users of thebstrcrate in the ecosystem. The latter is more explicit, and avoids potential naming conflicts (making it easier to, for instance, add it to the prelude). - Should the module be called
bstror change to something likebyte_str? https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134915#issuecomment-2906519023 - Should the
Displayimpl use the Unicode replacement character, or do escaping like theDebugimpl? - Add indexing for the new
std::rangetypes, or switch to it exclusively
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review implementation PR #135073 and the public API listed in this tracking issue first. The remaining work is to resolve the naming, module, Display, and indexing questions, then complete the final comment period and stabilization PR.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100