edition 2024 migration of `Command::before_exec` is suboptimal and doesn't compile
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 119k
- Forks
- 16.2k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
I ran cargo +nightly fix --edition on this code:
pub fn spawn_child() {
let _status = Command::new("some_program")
.before_exec(|| {
unsafe {
// Make the child process its own process group leader
if libc::setpgid(0, 0) != 0 {
return Err(std::io::Error::last_os_error());
}
Ok(())
}
})
.status();
}
And it made the following changes:
pub fn spawn_child() {
// TODO: Audit that the closure is async-signal-safe.
let _status = unsafe { Command::new("some_program")
.before_exec(|| {
unsafe {
// Make the child process its own process group leader
if libc::setpgid(0, 0) != 0 {
return Err(std::io::Error::last_os_error());
}
Ok(())
}
}) }
.status();
}
The output is unsatisfying in a few ways:
- There are now two
unsafeblocks, triggering theunused_unsafelint. before_execis still deprecated, so perhaps it should just be replaced withpre_exec?- The formatting is a bit weird; The newly added braces should get additional line breaks.
- The code doesn't compile once I add
edition = "2024"toCargo.toml:
error[E0716]: temporary value dropped while borrowed
--> src/lib.rs:7:9
|
7 | Command::new("some_program").before_exec(|| {
| -^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| |
| _________creates a temporary value which is freed while still in use
| |
8 | | unsafe {
9 | | // Make the child process its own process group leader
10 | | if libc::setpgid(0, 0) != 0 {
... |
14 | | }
15 | | })
| | -
| | |
| |__________temporary value is freed at the end of this statement
| borrow later used here
|
= note: consider using a `let` binding to create a longer lived value
I wouldn't have submitted an issue based on the first three, but since cargo fix is responsible for the new structure of the code, it seems like the failure to compile should have been avoidable.
I am confused about why this doesn't build. Why does pre_exec / before_exec cause there to be a dropped-while-borrowed temporary under the 2024 edition where none existed previously?
To repair the broken build, I guess something like this is required? (The let mut cmd part.)
pub fn spawn_child() {
let mut cmd = Command::new("some_program");
let _status = unsafe {
cmd.pre_exec(|| {
// Make the child process its own process group leader
if libc::setpgid(0, 0) != 0 {
return Err(std::io::Error::last_os_error());
}
Ok(())
})
}
.status();
}
Meta
rustc --version --verbose:
rustc 1.85.0-nightly (c94848c04 2024-12-05)
binary: rustc
commit-hash: c94848c046d29f9a80c09aae758e27e418a289f2
commit-date: 2024-12-05
host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
release: 1.85.0-nightly
LLVM version: 19.1.5
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Reproduce the issue with the supplied spawn_child example using cargo +nightly fix --edition and edition = "2024". Trace the cargo fix edition migration for Command::before_exec, then verify the generated code compiles, avoids redundant unsafe blocks, and handles the deprecated API and formatting concerns described.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- compilers, tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100