Misleading diagnostic output for typecheck failures that involve type inference
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 119k
- Forks
- 16.1k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
Code
Summarized:
- The input is a vector of schedule events: vec[x] contains the start time and end time for event x, and a target event number
- Whenever an event begins, the lowest-numbered resource must be allocated to that event
- The output is the ID number of the resource allocated to the target event
- My implementation used two
BinaryHeaps, one to track allocated resources, and a freelist to track available resources - The first heap's item type is
(Reverse(end_time), resource_id), so the heap is ordered by time-of-release ascending (sopop()/peek()refer to the next event that will end) - The second heap's item type is
Reverse(resource_id)so thatpopyields the lowest-numbered resource - A missing
Reverse()when pushing onto the second heap caused the first heap's type to incorrectly inferred - This causes a typecheck failure on a correct insert into the first heap
- The diagnostic hint explaining the first heap's type inference points to a statement that could not have possibly contributed to type inference
Current output
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> main.rs:58:30
|
33 | departures.pop();
| ---------- here the type of `departures` is inferred to be `BinaryHeap<(Reverse<_>, Reverse<i32>)>`
...
58 | departures.push( dep_item );
| ---- ^^^^^^^^ expected `(Reverse<_>, Reverse<i32>)`, found `(Reverse<i32>, i32)`
| |
| arguments to this method are incorrect
|
= note: expected tuple `(Reverse<_>, Reverse<i32>)`
found tuple `(Reverse<i32>, i32)`
note: method defined here
--> C:\Users\Stevie-O\.rustup\toolchains\stable-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\lib/rustlib/src/rust\library\alloc\src\collections\binary_heap\mod.rs:616:12
|
616 | pub fn push(&mut self, item: T) {
| ^^^^
Desired output
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> main.rs:58:30
|
29 | Some( &(Reverse(dt), seat_num) )
| ----------------------- here the type of `departures` is inferred to be `BinaryHeap<(Reverse<_>, Reverse<i32>)>`
Rationale and extra context
I don't really know exactly what it should say, but I'm quite certain that it shouldn't say that the type of departures was inferred from the departures.pop() call, a statement from which virtually zero type information can be inferred.
If I could get anything I wanted plus a pony, it would have wanted it to point me to line 29, which is where I'm pretty sure that the actual type inference came from line 29:
Some( &(Reverse(dt), seat_num) )
And then point out that seat_num is a Reverse<i32> because of line 34:
free_seats.push(seat_num); // <- NOTE the missing Reverse() around seat_num
Getting all of that seems rather impractical; however, I expect that if it had told me that the second tuple element was inferred to be a Reverse<> from the match pattern, I would have spent a less time looking for the real bug, which was the erroneous statement above.
Other cases
No response
Rust Version
rustc 1.82.0 (f6e511eec 2024-10-15)
binary: rustc
commit-hash: f6e511eec7342f59a25f7c0534f1dbea00d01b14
commit-date: 2024-10-15
host: x86_64-pc-windows-msvc
release: 1.82.0
LLVM version: 19.1.1
Anything else?
No response
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Reproduce the linked Rust Playground example with rustc 1.82.0 and compare the current E0308 output with the requested output. Start from main.rs lines 29, 33, 34, and 58, then trace how the type-inference note is selected; done means the diagnostic points to the inference source rather than departures.pop().
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100