[QNX] `Backtrace::{capture,force_capture}` triggers OOM on ARM64 when called from a thread other than `main`
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 119k
- Forks
- 16.1k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
The following program triggers an OOM condition when executed on a aarch64-unknown-nto-qnx710 target. The x86_64-pc-nto-qnx710 target is not affected by the issue. Other QNX targets have not been checked.
use std::backtrace::Backtrace;
// does OOM
fn main() {
let handle = std::thread::spawn(|| {
let trace = Backtrace::force_capture();
});
handle.join().unwrap();
}
$ ./gh130784
memory allocation of 3758096384 bytes failed
Calling the Backtrace::force_capture function from the main function / thread does not result in an OOM condition.
// no OOM
fn main() {
let trace = Backtrace::force_capture();
println!("{trace}");
}
$ ./gh130784-workaround
(..)
2: std::backtrace::Backtrace::create
at ./rustc/1.83.0/library/std/src/backtrace.rs:331:13
3: error_with_backtrace_outputs_correctly::main
4: std::sys::backtrace::__rust_begin_short_backtrace
5: std::rt::lang_start::{{closure}}
(..)
The issue also affects the Backtrace::capture API when the RUST_BACKTRACE env var is set:
use std::backtrace::Backtrace;
// does OOM
fn main() {
std::env::set_var("RUST_BACKTRACE", "1");
let handle = std::thread::spawn(|| {
let trace = Backtrace::capture();
});
handle.join().unwrap();
}
It's also worth noting that the built-in backtrace support (RUST_BACKTRACE=1) works fine on aarch64-unknown-nto-qnx710 since the /tests/ui/backtrace tests pass. Also, backtraces from panicking threads are printed as expected.
// no OOM
fn main() {
std::env::set_var("RUST_BACKTRACE", "1");
let handle = std::thread::spawn(|| {
foo();
});
assert!(handle.join().is_err());
}
#[inline(never)]
fn foo() {
panic!("backtrace works: {:x}", foo as fn() as usize);
}
$ ./rust-backtrace-works
thread '<unnamed>' panicked at <some-path>.rs:28:5:
backtrace works: 20223d58a8
stack backtrace:
0: rust_begin_unwind
at ./rustc/1.83.0/library/std/src/panicking.rs:665:5
1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
at ./rustc/1.83.0/library/core/src/panicking.rs:74:14
2: <crate_name>::foo
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.
Changelog
- (2024-09-24 19:50:38+02:00) note that
Backtrace::captureis also affected. note that the built-inRUST_BACKTRACEfunctionality is not affected when other threads panics. - (2024-09-24 19:27:45+02:00) minimized repro example to a single call to
Backtrace::force_capture. before it was replicating thestd::error::tests::error_with_backtrace_outputs_correctly_with_one_sourcefunction which uses unstable libstd API.
cc @flba-eb @gh-tr @jonathanpallant (QNX 7.1 maintainers)
FYI @nyurik this may be relevant to the aarch64-unknown-nto-qnx700 target
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with library/std/src/backtrace.rs around the Backtrace::create call shown in the report, then inspect the /tests/ui/backtrace tests. Reproduce the threaded force_capture and capture cases on aarch64-unknown-nto-qnx710 and compare them with main-thread and panic backtraces. Done means these APIs no longer trigger an OOM on the affected target, with coverage for the regression.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- operating-systems
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 38/100