Inconsistent behavior when indexing slice/BTreeSet with `1..=0`

I tried this code:

use std::collections::BTreeSet;

fn main() {
    assert_eq!(&[123][1..=0], []);
    
    let set = BTreeSet::from_iter([123]);
    assert_eq!(set.range(1..=0).copied().collect::<Vec<i32>>(), &[]);
}

I expected to see this happen: Either both should panic since the range start is greater than the range end, or both should yield 0 items.

Instead, this happened: The slice indexing assertion passes, but the BTreeSet operation panics:

range start is greater than range end in BTreeSet

Meta

Reproduces on stable 1.80 and current nightly.

Start with the reproducer comparing slice indexing with BTreeSet::range(1..=0), and confirm the behavior on stable and nightly Rust. Trace the relevant standard-library implementations and existing range tests, then determine which behavior should be made consistent. Done means the chosen behavior is consistent and covered by regression tests.