Tracking Issue for postfix match
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 119k
- Forks
- 16.1k
- PR merge metrics
- PR metrics pending
Description
This is a tracking issue for the RFC "Postfix Match" (rust-lang/rfcs#3295).
The feature gate for the issue is #![feature(postfix_match)].
About tracking issues
Tracking issues are used to record the overall progress of implementation.
They are also used as hubs connecting to other relevant issues, e.g., bugs or open design questions.
A tracking issue is however not meant for large scale discussion, questions, or bug reports about a feature.
Instead, open a dedicated issue for the specific matter and add the relevant feature gate label.
Steps
- Implement the RFC
- Get consensus on design, and if we even want this feature
- Adjust documentation (see instructions on rustc-dev-guide)
- Formatting for new syntax has been added to the Style Guide (nightly-style-procedure)
- Stabilization PR (see instructions on rustc-dev-guide)
Unresolved Questions
-
Lifetime extension
Method call chains will not lifetime extend their arguments. Match statements, however, are notorious for having lifetime extension. It is currently unclear if promoting these use-cases of match would cause more subtle bugs, or if it's negligible -
Postfix macros
One thing that was brought up was that it may be possible to implement this with the rust-lang/rfcs#2442 feature. But this feature has not been implemented yet, so that is yet to be seen.
Implementation history
- #121619
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with RFC rust-lang/rfcs#3295 and the postfix_match feature gate, then review the tracking checklist and its linked stabilization, documentation, and style-guide instructions. Done requires resolving the listed design questions, documenting the feature, adding syntax formatting guidance, and completing stabilization; no source file or test is named.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100