Bad error snippet for cargotest failure

Open
#93 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
45/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
rust
Domain
ci-cd, devtools

Research direction

Start with the linked pull-request comment and reproduce the snippet produced for the cargotest failure. Trace the log-analyzer entry point that selects excerpts, then compare its output with the failure block shown in this issue. Done means the snippet includes the failing test and its actual error instead of unrelated build and test-suite sections.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

I am not sure how the bot decided what to put into the snippet here but it doesn't include the actual problem. What I would have hoped for is something like this:

failures:

---- alt_registry::no_api stdout ----
running `/Users/runner/work/rust/rust/build/aarch64-apple-darwin/stage2-tools/aarch64-apple-darwin/release/cargo check`
running `/Users/runner/work/rust/rust/build/aarch64-apple-darwin/stage2-tools/aarch64-apple-darwin/release/cargo login --registry alternative`

thread 'alt_registry::no_api' (2024432) panicked at src/tools/cargo/tests/testsuite/alt_registry.rs:821:10:

test failed running `/Users/runner/work/rust/rust/build/aarch64-apple-darwin/stage2-tools/aarch64-apple-darwin/release/cargo login --registry alternative`
error: could not exec process `/Users/runner/work/rust/rust/build/aarch64-apple-darwin/stage2-tools/aarch64-apple-darwin/release/cargo login --registry alternative`: could not execute process `/Users/runner/work/rust/rust/build/aarch64-apple-darwin/stage2-tools/aarch64-apple-darwin/release/cargo login --registry alternative` (never executed)

Caused by:
    Broken pipe (os error 32)

Stack backtrace:
   0: <std::backtrace::Backtrace>::create
   1: <std::io::error::Error as anyhow::context::ext::StdError>::ext_context::<cargo_util::process_error::ProcessError>
   2: <cargo_util::process_builder::ProcessBuilder>::output
   3: <cargo_util::process_builder::ProcessBuilder>::exec_with_output
   4: <cargo_test_support::Execs>::run
   5: testsuite::alt_registry::no_api
   6: <testsuite::alt_registry::no_api::{closure#0} as core::ops::function::FnOnce<()>>::call_once
   7: test::__rust_begin_short_backtrace::<core::result::Result<(), alloc::string::String>, fn() -> core::result::Result<(), alloc::string::String>>
   8: test::run_test::{closure#0}
   9: std::sys::backtrace::__rust_begin_short_backtrace::<test::run_test::{closure#1}, ()>
  10: <std::thread::lifecycle::spawn_unchecked<test::run_test::{closure#1}, ()>::{closure#1} as core::ops::function::FnOnce<()>>::call_once::{shim:vtable#0}
  11: <std::sys::thread::unix::Thread>::new::thread_start
  12: __pthread_cond_wait
stack backtrace:
   0: __rustc::rust_begin_unwind
   1: core::panicking::panic_fmt
   2: cargo_test_support::panic_error::pe
   3: <cargo_test_support::Execs>::run
   4: testsuite::alt_registry::no_api
   5: <testsuite::alt_registry::no_api::{closure#0} as core::ops::function::FnOnce<()>>::call_once
note: Some details are omitted, run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` for a verbose backtrace.
---- alt_registry::no_api stdout end ----

failures:
    alt_registry::no_api

test result: FAILED. 3771 passed; 1 failed; 391 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 581.98s

Instead, it shows random parts of the LLVM build, the rustdoc test suite, and ends with some random test suite in the middle of the log where nothing failed.

Dominant language
Rust
Stars
52
Forks
27
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from rust-lang/rust-log-analyzer

All issues in rust-lang/rust-log-analyzer

Similar issues

More Rust issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.