rust-lang / rust-lang/rust-clippy

`unnecessary_lazy_evaluations` does not take cost of expression into account

Open
#8,522 7 comments 7 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

C-bug I-false-positive
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
13.5k
Forks
2.2k
Avg merge
2d 10h
Merged PRs (30d)
32

Description

Summary

See reproducer.

Lint Name

unnecessary_lazy_evaluations

Reproducer

I tried this code [playground]:

#![allow(unused)]

struct ParsedItem<'a, T>(&'a [u8], T);

fn first_match<'a, T>(
    options: impl IntoIterator<Item = (&'a [u8], T)>,
    case_sensitive: bool,
) -> impl FnMut(&'a [u8]) -> Option<ParsedItem<'a, T>> {
    move |input| None
}

fn parse(input: &[u8]) {
    let zone_literal = first_match(
        [
            (&b"UT"[..], 0),
            (&b"GMT"[..], 0),
            (&b"EST"[..], -5),
            (&b"EDT"[..], -4),
            (&b"CST"[..], -6),
            (&b"CDT"[..], -5),
            (&b"MST"[..], -7),
            (&b"MDT"[..], -6),
            (&b"PST"[..], -8),
            (&b"PDT"[..], -7),
        ],
        false,
    )(input)
    .or_else(|| match input {
        [
            b'a'..=b'i' | b'k'..=b'z' | b'A'..=b'I' | b'K'..=b'Z',
            rest @ ..,
        ] => Some(ParsedItem(rest, 0)),
        _ => None,
    });
}

NB: This is actual code from the time crate. first_match is only present to ensure compilation succeeds.

I saw this happen:

Checking playground v0.0.1 (/playground)
warning: unnecessary closure used to substitute value for `Option::None`
  --> src/lib.rs:13:24
13 |       let zone_literal = first_match(
   |  ________________________^
14 | |         [
15 | |             (&b"UT"[..], 0),
16 | |             (&b"GMT"[..], 0),
...  |
33 | |         _ => None,
34 | |     });
   | |______^
   |
   = note: `#[warn(clippy::unnecessary_lazy_evaluations)]` on by default
   = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#unnecessary_lazy_evaluations
help: use `or` instead
   |
13 ~     let zone_literal = first_match(
14 +         [
15 +             (&b"UT"[..], 0),
16 +             (&b"GMT"[..], 0),
17 +             (&b"EST"[..], -5),
18 +             (&b"EDT"[..], -4),
 ...

warning: `playground` (lib) generated 1 warning
    Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 5.90s

I expected to see this happen:

unnecessary_lazy_evaluations should not be triggered. The expression inside the or_else closure is arbitrary and non-trivial. By requesting the user change or_else to or, whatever the closure contains is now eagerly evaluated at an unknown cost. As such I believe the lint should only trigger when the closure contains a literal or value that is statically known (setting aside const eval). This would ensure that only trivial cases are linted against.

Version
rustc 1.59.0 (9d1b2106e 2022-02-23)
binary: rustc
commit-hash: 9d1b2106e23b1abd32fce1f17267604a5102f57a
commit-date: 2022-02-23
host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
release: 1.59.0
LLVM version: 13.0.0
Additional Labels

No response

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by locating the unnecessary_lazy_evaluations lint implementation and its tests in rust-lang/rust-clippy, then reproduce the supplied or_else example with the Rust 1.59.0 behavior described. Done means the lint no longer suggests or for a non-trivial closure while existing trivial cases remain covered by tests.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
45/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.