rust-lang / rust-lang/rust-clippy

if_same_then_else Should not warn for `else if` blocks.

Open
#3,770 30 comments 5 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

good first issue I-false-positive S-needs-discussion
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
13.5k
Forks
2.2k
Avg merge
2d 10h
Merged PRs (30d)
32

Description

View all comments

if condition1() {
  1
} else if condition2() {
  1
} else if condition3() {
  2
} else {
  3
}

There are many cases where code like this shouldn't be warned on. While you could do condition1() || condition2() often times it is more clear of the intent if they are separate. Especially if the conditions are non-trivial compared to the value being returned.

I think the right time for this warning to warn is if the last if has the same condition as the else. For example the following two cases would warn.

if condition1() {
  1
} else {
  1
}
if condition1() {
  1
} else if condition2() {
  2
} else {
  2
}

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by locating the if_same_then_else lint entry point and its existing tests in rust-clippy. Compare the reported chained else-if example with the two cases that should warn, then update the behavior and verify that the intended warning cases still pass.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
58/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.