rust-lang / rust-lang/rust-clippy
if_same_then_else Should not warn for `else if` blocks.
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 13.5k
- Forks
- 2.2k
- Avg merge
- 2d 10h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 32
Description
if condition1() {
1
} else if condition2() {
1
} else if condition3() {
2
} else {
3
}
There are many cases where code like this shouldn't be warned on. While you could do condition1() || condition2() often times it is more clear of the intent if they are separate. Especially if the conditions are non-trivial compared to the value being returned.
I think the right time for this warning to warn is if the last if has the same condition as the else. For example the following two cases would warn.
if condition1() {
1
} else {
1
}
if condition1() {
1
} else if condition2() {
2
} else {
2
}
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the if_same_then_else lint entry point and its existing tests in rust-clippy. Compare the reported chained else-if example with the two cases that should warn, then update the behavior and verify that the intended warning cases still pass.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 58/100