rust-lang / rust-lang/rust-clippy

Lint reading an option and then overwriting it with `None`

Open
#1,853 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

A-lint E-medium L-unnecessary T-middle
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
13.5k
Forks
2.2k
Avg merge
2d 10h
Merged PRs (30d)
32

Description

let old = some_option;
... code not reference `some_option`
some_option = None;
// use `old`

should be

let old = some_option.take();

Some care must be taken not to change behaviour. Accessing old and changing control flow (break, return) before some_option = None would be a legitimate case that the lint should not trigger on.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No implementation file, test, or entry point is named. Start by locating the Rust lint code and its tests, then trace how the lint identifies an option read followed by an unconditional assignment to None. Done means it suggests take() only when no use of the old value or control-flow change occurs before the assignment, with tests covering the legitimate exceptions.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.