Two suggestions for more DRY code

Given this code:

struct Foo { cap: usize }
impl Foo {
    fn new() -> Foo { Foo { cap: 1 } }
    fn with_capacity(cap: usize) -> Foo {
        Foo { cap: cap }
    }
}
fn main() {}

In my opinion Clippy should suggest to replace four of those usages of "Foo" with "Self" and to remove one ": cap", making the code more DRY, the intended resulting code should be:

struct Foo { cap: usize }
impl Foo {
    fn new() -> Self { Self { cap: 1 } }
    fn with_capacity(cap: usize) -> Self {
        Self { cap }
    }
}
fn main() {}

The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start from the Rust example and determine where Clippy handles these constructor and struct-field patterns; done means both suggestions produce the shown DRY code and are covered by appropriate lint tests.