rust-lang / rust-lang/rust-clippy

Figure out which Common Weakness Enumerations Rust or Clippy eliminates or mitgates

Open
#1,456 1 comment 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

A-documentation C-an-interesting-project E-medium L-correctness S-needs-discussion
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
13.5k
Forks
2.2k
Avg merge
2d 10h
Merged PRs (30d)
32

Description

The top 25 can be found here: http://cwe.mitre.org/top25/index.html

The next 16 candidates for the top 25 are here: http://cwe.mitre.org/top25/archive/2011/2011_onthecusp.html

I made a list out of them. Check the box if solved, move into the other list if mitgated

Unreviewed and Solved issues

Reviewed issues found to not be fully solved

Unsolvable issues (please supply reason)

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the CWE Top 25 and on-the-cusp links in the issue, then review the listed solved, unreviewed, and partially solved entries. Determine which weaknesses Rust or Clippy actually eliminates or mitigates, and document the reason for each classification. Done means the list is reviewed with unresolved cases and limitations clearly identified.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
security, tooling
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.