rust-lang / rust-lang/rust-clippy

`unneeded_struct_pattern` triggers when matching 3rd-party crate's variant with `{ .. }`

Open
#14,181 1 comment 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

C-bug I-false-positive
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
13.5k
Forks
2.2k
Avg merge
2d 10h
Merged PRs (30d)
32

Description

Summary

Turning a unit variant into a struct or tuple variant is a major breaking change.

Sometimes, downstream code that consumes an upstream crate's enum variants might care only about "which variant was chosen" and doesn't care whether the variant might (now or in the future) have associated data. In such a situation, I feel it isn't unreasonable to use MyEnum::MyVariant { .. } syntax regardless of whether MyVariant is a unit or not.

Of course, MyEnum::MyVariant is sufficient syntax if the variant is a unit. But in this case, we don't "own" the MyEnum type, and changes in the variant kind aren't up to us. Adding the { .. } is explicit about wishing to be future-proof to changes in the variant kind, so I think it shouldn't trigger a lint — especially not an on-by-default lint.

Lint Name

unneeded_struct_pattern

Reproducer

I tried this code:

fn example(kind: &cargo_metadata::TargetKind) {
    match kind {
        cargo_metadata::TargetKind::Lib { .. } => todo!(),
        _ => todo!(),
    }
}

I saw this happen:

warning: struct pattern is not needed for a unit variant
   --> src/lib.rs:12:40
    |
 12 |         cargo_metadata::TargetKind::Lib { .. } => todo!(),
    |                                        ^^^^^^^ help: remove the struct pattern
    |
    = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#unneeded_struct_pattern
    = note: `#[warn(clippy::unneeded_struct_pattern)]` on by default

I expected to see this happen:

No lint reported. My code is saying "we don't care if this 3rd-party crate's variant becomes a tuple or struct variant in the future" and attempting to remain resilient to a potential future breaking change.

Version
rustc 1.86.0-nightly (bef3c3b01 2025-02-04)
binary: rustc
commit-hash: bef3c3b01f690de16738b1c9f36470fbfc6ac623
commit-date: 2025-02-04
host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
release: 1.86.0-nightly
LLVM version: 19.1.7
Additional Labels

No response

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the unneeded_struct_pattern lint and reproduce the report using the shown cargo_metadata::TargetKind::Lib { .. } match on the stated Rust nightly version. Check the lint's existing behavior for unit variants and confirm that the third-party variant pattern produces no warning while the intended lint cases remain covered by tests.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
45/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.