rust-lang / rust-lang/rust-bindgen

Consider rewriting the parsing back-end as a clang plugin instead of using libclang.

Open
#297 9 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

A-libclang I-unclear
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
5.3k
Forks
829
Avg merge
1d 1h
Merged PRs (30d)
15

Description

This would be sort of a pain, but it's the only way we see us generating more correct code for all the partial template specialization madness we're going through with m-c. I already discussed this in #41 and similar IIRC.

We would need to comunicate with the front-end of course, we could do that via json or similar.

I might introduce an experimental back-end for this if I have the time and we keep breaking stylo.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No file or test is named. Start by reading the existing libclang parsing backend and the discussion in issue #41, then trace how the parser communicates with the front-end. Done would require an agreed clang-plugin backend boundary, including the proposed JSON-style communication and handling of partial template specializations.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
cpp, rust
Domain
compilers, tooling
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.