rust-lang / rust-lang/rust-bindgen
odd matching on c++ class
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 5.3k
- Forks
- 829
- Avg merge
- 1d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 15
Description
Given this C++:
namespace llvm {
namespace object {
class Archive : public Binary {
...
public:
class Child {
...
}
}
}
}
Calling builder::opaque_type and builder::whitelist_type with "llvm::object::Archive::Child" does not match. However, calling those methods with "llvm::object::Archive_Child" does match. That doesn't seem right.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing the C++ nested-class example and compare builder::opaque_type and builder::whitelist_type with the qualified name llvm::object::Archive::Child versus llvm::object::Archive_Child. Trace the matching entry points to determine why the qualified nested name is not recognized; done means the intended nested-class spelling matches consistently.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp, rust
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100