rust-lang / rust-lang/rust-analyzer
IDE functionality in unsaved examples
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 16.9k
- Forks
- 2.2k
- Avg merge
- 1d 12h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 72
Description
While your basic GUI editor like VS Code can’t do it, the majority of command line editors support providing the path a file will be saved under prior to actually writing out the buffer upon first save.
I realize this could be an issue with the LSP client, so please correct me if so, but in cases where the user creates a buffer associated with an unmaterialized path, could RA use that path instead of showing errors about the buffer not being part of the crate tree?
eg :e examples/foo.rs will currently trip up RA until a :w is issued, but does that need to be the case (assuming the client sends the path along)?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reproducing the :e examples/foo.rs case before and after :w, then trace how the LSP client provides the unsaved path and how rust-analyzer checks whether a buffer belongs to the crate tree. Done means an unsaved buffer with a valid future path no longer triggers the reported crate-tree errors, while the existing save workflow remains correct.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- devtools
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100