rust-lang / rust-lang/rust-analyzer
Assist: add/remove enumerate from a `for` loop
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 16.9k
- Forks
- 2.2k
- Avg merge
- 1d 12h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 72
Description
Frequently I need to do some iteration and have to add .enumerate() which then forces me to go and change the signature of the for loop to match.
Would love if this could be an editor assist. Would be happy to implement if accepted.
// Going from
for item in items.iter() {
}
// to
for (idx, item) in items.iter().enumerate() {
}
and vice versa.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names an editor assist for Rust for-loops and .enumerate(), but no source files, tests, or entry points. Start by locating existing rust-analyzer assists for loop transformations, then inspect their tests and determine how both adding and removing .enumerate() should be covered. Done means the assist supports both directions with tests for the shown forms.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100