rust-lang / rust-lang/rust-analyzer

Feature request: Infer generate-function return type from usage as inverted conditional

Open
#16,888 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

C-feature
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
16.9k
Forks
2.2k
Avg merge
1d 12h
Merged PRs (30d)
72

Description

Given

fn main() {
    if !foo() {}
}

it's almost certain that foo returns a bool¹. Currently, using the generate-function assist on it generates

fn foo() -> _ {
    todo!()
}

but I think it should generate

fn foo() -> bool {
    todo!()
}

¹ it could theoretically return any other type that implements std::ops::Not<Output = bool>, but I have never seen any code with an impl like that

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by locating the generate-function assist and tracing how it infers return types from call-site usage, especially the inverted conditional shown in the issue. Update the behavior so this example produces a bool return type, and verify the assist output with the relevant existing checks or tests.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
48/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.