rust-lang / rust-lang/rust-analyzer
Improve some snippet for convinient
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 16.9k
- Forks
- 2.2k
- Avg merge
- 1d 12h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 72
Description
Almost fn will return something. I felt uncomfortable when use fn snippet but not have a placeholder after braces. It need to be like this:
fn {0}({1}) -> {2} {
{3}
}
If you jump to place holder 2 it will contain available -> for you, you just need to fill in the second placeholder. If you don't, jump to the third placeholder and -> disappear.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file or test is named; start by locating the fn snippet definition in the rust-analyzer repository and inspect how its placeholders are represented. Done means the snippet supports the requested return-type placeholder behavior, including removing the arrow when that placeholder is skipped, with the relevant snippet behavior verified.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100