[UR] local storage inside function
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Markdown
- Stars
- 6.6k
- Forks
- 1.7k
- Avg merge
- 16h 14m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Wednesday Jan 22, 2014 at 16:39 GMT
For earlier discussion, see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/11726
This issue was labelled with: I-enhancement in the Rust repository
It could be great to have local storage that are unique by function call site (like Lustre does).
This reduce the need for dynamique memory and it's much easier than doing it by hand. This is also great for real time application, or application that refuse dynamic memory (for security, safety or speed reason).
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the earlier discussion in rust-lang/rust issue 11726 and the repository's RFC process. Clarify the proposed function-call-site local storage semantics and determine what an accepted RFC would need to specify before implementation can begin.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100