Should be more explicit that coercions aren't used to satisfy trait bounds.
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 48/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Start with the linked type coercions section in the Rust Reference and review its explanation of coercion sites. Use the provided generic-bound example to clarify that coercions do not satisfy inferred trait bounds, while an explicitly specified type can permit the coercion. Done means the section includes this distinction and an understandable example.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
The section on type coercions should be more explicit that coercions aren't used to satisfy generic bounds. I've noticed some people getting caught off guard by that.
Here is an example of what I am talking about:
struct A(B);
struct B;
trait Trait {}
impl Trait for B {}
impl std::ops::Deref for A {
type Target = B;
fn deref(&self) -> &B { &self.0 }
}
fn f<T: Trait>(t: &T) {}
fn main() {
let a = A(B);
// Error: the trait `Trait` is not implemented for `A`.
f(&a);
// Ok, since the trait bound was manually specified.
f::<B>(&a);
}
I know the paragraph at the top says:
A coercion can only occur at certain coercion sites in a program; these are typically places where the desired type is explicit or can be derived by propagation from explicit types (without type inference).
However, adding an example, or even a dedicated section showing when type coercions wouldn't occur would better help explain the concept.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 1.6k
- Forks
- 607
- Avg merge
- 1d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 12
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from rust-lang/reference
-
A-const-eval A-undefined-behavior
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
A-resolve
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
-
A-coercions
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
All issues in rust-lang/reference
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
kwakseongjae/auto-hwp#319 ·
-
area:cli bug filter-quality good first issue priority:medium
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 72/100
bevyengine/bevy#25861 ·
-
comp-datalake
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
ClickHouse/ClickHouse#121222 ·
-
enhancement remote
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100