Incomplete documentation of `while let` syntax regarding lazy boolean operator expressions.

Open
#771 4 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
1/5
Estimated time
Under an hour
Newbie friendliness
45/100
Issue type
Documentation
Clarity
Clearly specified
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
rust
Domain
documentation

Research direction

Compare the Rust Reference sections on if let and while let, following the links in the issue, and review the linked RFC's rollout plan. Update the while let documentation to note the restriction on top-level || and && expressions, then verify that the wording matches the existing reference and current behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

A-grammar

Comparing the reference’s section on if let vs. the one on while let, the latter contains no note about top-level || and && being disallowed, even though this is the case by the corresponding RFC as well as in practice.

Dominant language
Rust
Stars
1.6k
Forks
607
Avg merge
1d 1h
Merged PRs (30d)
12

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from rust-lang/reference

All issues in rust-lang/reference

Similar issues

More Rust issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.