Review RFC 0090 (lexical-syntax-simplification)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- documentation
Research direction
Start by reading RFC 0090, linked from the issue, and compare its lexical-syntax changes with the current Rust Reference. The issue does not identify affected reference sections, tests, or a concrete completion condition, so clarify the review scope and expected documentation changes before starting.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 1.6k
- Forks
- 607
- Avg merge
- 1d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 12
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from rust-lang/reference
-
A-const-eval A-undefined-behavior
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 76/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 72/100
-
A-resolve
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 62/100
-
A-coercions
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 65/100
All issues in rust-lang/reference
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 86/100
kwakseongjae/auto-hwp#319 ·
-
area:cli bug filter-quality good first issue priority:medium
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 84/100
-
Difficulty 1/5 Under an hour Newbie friendliness 72/100
bevyengine/bevy#25861 ·
-
comp-datalake
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
ClickHouse/ClickHouse#121222 ·
-
enhancement remote
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 68/100