rust-lang / rust-lang/reference

Semantics of 'static lifetime are not explained

Open
#1,994 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

A-lifetimes
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
1.6k
Forks
607
PR merge metrics
PR metrics pending

Description

It's never explained what 'static actually means. Currently, the only definition of 'static given is two examples of what could be 'static. Namely:

The exact semantics of 'static should be made clear.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reading the linked sections in lifetime-elision.md, constant-items.md, subtyping.md, and literal-expr.md to compare how 'static is currently described. Trace the existing examples and determine where the Reference should state its semantics explicitly. Done means the documentation clearly explains 'static, with the existing examples remaining consistent.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
documentation
Issue type
Documentation
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
42/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.