Should links generated by docs.rs have the `rel=nofollow` attribute?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 1.2k
- Forks
- 232
- Avg merge
- 11h 35m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 60
Description
I notice that links, in the README, the docs themselves, and in sidebar and drop-down-menu areas, do not have the rel=nofollow attribute.
I can see docs.rs just accumulating the Google Juice, since there are probably going to be a lot of inbound links, the site is constantly getting new content that's mostly text, and the front page ensures that Google can't miss anything.
So what's to stop "crate authors" from using docs.rs for black-hat SEO? If we don't want links to be nofollow, might we instead want a Report button to let people flag spam?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review how docs.rs generates links in README content, documentation pages, sidebars, and drop-down menus. Decide whether the project should use rel="nofollow" or provide spam reporting, then document the chosen policy and its expected behavior across those link locations.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100