naming conventions for separating cli apps from libs
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 1.1k
- Forks
- 122
- Avg merge
- 10h 37m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
I was going to start a discussion on this on twitter https://twitter.com/softprops/status/1049729377699794944 but then I remembered this working group existed.
What I'm looking for is some guidance and direction for the current community standards ( if they exist ) around what to name my workspace members when I want to split a lib from cli app that is an interface for the lib. Ideally I'd be able to share the name for both but that's not possible with separate packages because their names are their unique identifiers!
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No file, test, or entry point is named. Start by reading the full issue discussion and inspecting the existing Rust CLI book guidance for package and workspace naming. Done would mean reaching a documented community direction for naming a library and its companion CLI.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- cli, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100