Suspicious mask
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100
- Issue type
- Bug
- Clarity
- Clearly specified
- Activity status
- Stale
- Domain
- compilers
Research direction
Inspect src/tests/integration/test-data/specs/store-symbolic-bytes.k at line 19 and compare the final byte expression with the preceding byte. Confirm whether the missing &Int 255 mask is unintended, then update the specification if needed and verify the relevant integration test passes.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
In #85, the last byte doesn't have &Int 255 mask, while the previous one has.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 7
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from runtimeverification/riscv-semantics
-
documentation
runtimeverification/riscv-semantics#159 · 1 assignee ·
-
documentation
runtimeverification/riscv-semantics#158 · 1 assignee ·
-
question
runtimeverification/riscv-semantics#157 · 1 assignee ·
-
runtimeverification/riscv-semantics#150 · 1 assignee ·
-
enhancement
runtimeverification/riscv-semantics#149 · 1 assignee ·
All issues in runtimeverification/riscv-semantics
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
bancolombia/sentinel#23 ·
-
test md OpenCI
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
integration:quickjs org:external priority:backlog topic:code-interpreter topic:middleware type:feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
langchain-ai/deepagents#6450 ·
-
bug client
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100