`k2nix` proposal
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Assessment
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100
- Issue type
- Feature
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Activity status
- Stale
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- build-system, developer-experience
Research direction
Start by reviewing issue #47 and the proposed kbuild design, including the .kbuild example and boilerplate Nix flake using dream2nix. Determine how kbuild should translate project and dependency declarations into a flake and how kbuild shell . should invoke the resulting development environment. Done means the design is specified well enough to implement and provides the listed K, plugin, solc, and secp256k1 dependencies.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Description
Having investigated #47, it turns out that the nix provided clang/c++ binaries are specially wrapped to ignore system wide paths as suspected. This wiki gives a bit more detail https://nixos.wiki/wiki/C, see also https://nixos.wiki/wiki/FAQ/I_installed_a_library_but_my_compiler_is_not_finding_it._Why%3F. THe way nix does this is to wrap the binaries in a script which reads any additional includes from NIX_CFLAGS_COMPILE/NIX_LDFLAGS. When a nix derivation is added to the buildInputs, nix automagically adds the relevant includes/ from those derivation to these vars inside it's build environment. The same thing happens when we call nix develop inside the project (e.g. evm-semantics), i.e. nix provides a shell with the same set of evn vars set correctly for clang to find the necessary libraries.
Given that C/C++ has no package manager, I think this is a sensible decision, but it does pose a question of how to provide an environment for developing with K, which implicitly relies on clang for the llvm-backend. One option would be to just patch nix provided clang to either look at the system path or alternatively provide versions of clang with the relevant libraries included in its search path, as discussed previously. However, both approaches go somewhat counter to nix philosophy and more importantly, given the discussions around kbuild, I believe it would make more sense to instead design a kbuild YAML/TOML format which nix can consume to supply the extra dependencies various projects require. This way, users wouldn't have to drop into the full nix language for basic/pre-packaged scenarios. Using nix in conjunction with kbuild, we could leverage nix to not only build executables but also provide us with a deterministic developer shell, which is largely consistent across the various distros, thus not relying on any system wide tools.
Roughly speaking we could have a .kbuild file:
[project]
k = ">=5.3.0"
title = "evm-semantics"
version = "0.1.0"
[dependencies.k]
repo = "https://github.com/runtimeverification/k"
rev = "..."
[dependencies.blockchain-k-plugin]
repo = "https://github.com/runtimeverification/blockchain-k-plugin"
rev = "..."
[dependencies.secp256k1]
type = "nix"
[dependencies.runtime.solc]
type = "nix"
...
and a boilerplate nix flake
{
inputs = {
dream2nix.url = "github:nix-community/dream2nix";
};
outputs = {
self,
dream2nix,
} @ inp:
(dream2nix.lib.makeFlakeOutputs {
systems = ["x86_64-linux"];
config.projectRoot = ./.;
source = ./.;
projects = ./projects.toml;
});
}
where the .kbuild file would actually get translated by dream2nix into a flake via makeFlakeOutputs.
Then, calling something like kbuild shell . would simply call nix develop ., providing us with a shell with k, blockchain plugin, solc, secp256k1, etc.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 10
- Forks
- 2
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
More from runtimeverification/kup
-
Difficulty 3/5 1-2 days Newbie friendliness 52/100
runtimeverification/kup#149 ·
-
Difficulty 4/5 3-5 days Newbie friendliness 35/100
runtimeverification/kup#138 ·
-
runtimeverification/kup#137 · 1 comment · 1 assignee ·
-
runtimeverification/kup#136 · 1 assignee ·
-
runtimeverification/kup#135 · 1 assignee ·
All issues in runtimeverification/kup
Similar issues
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
bancolombia/sentinel#23 ·
-
test md OpenCI
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
-
integration:quickjs org:external priority:backlog topic:code-interpreter topic:middleware type:feature
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100
langchain-ai/deepagents#6450 ·
-
bug client
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 88/100
-
Difficulty 2/5 1-3 hours Newbie friendliness 74/100