runtimeverification / runtimeverification/evm-semantics
using this semantics in Coq
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- KCL
- Stars
- 591
- Forks
- 156
- Avg merge
- 2h 19m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Has anyone explored how to use the KEVM semantics in Coq? Is there a generic K to Coq translator or has someone written a specific translation for KEVM?
I would like to use this semantics to prove correctness of an implementation of an optimized EVM interpretor or jit compliler.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by surveying the KEVM and K repositories for existing Coq translation or proof-integration work, then determine whether a generic translator is in scope. Done should be a documented, agreed path for using KEVM in Coq or a clearly scoped implementation plan.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- blockchain, compilers
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100