rubyforgood / rubyforgood/casa
☂️ Standard Court Orders
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 381
- Forks
- 542
- Avg merge
- 3d 15h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 47
Description
What type(s) of User Does This Feature Affect?
- supervisors
- admins
- volunteers
Description
We would like to make it a bit easier for volunteers to set up court orders. Typically an organization has a set of "standard" court orders that cases will be subject to. Lets make it a bit easier for them to set that up on a per case basis.
Completion Criteria
- #4123
- #5781
How to Access the QA Site
Login Details:
Link to QA site
Login Emails:
- volunteer1@example.com view site as a volunteer
- supervisor1@example.com view site as a supervisor
- casa_admin1@example.com view site as an admin
- all_casa_admin1@example.com view site as an all casa admin
- go to
/all_casa_admins/sign_in
- go to
password for all users: 12345678
Questions? Join Slack!
We highly recommend that you join us in slack #casa channel to ask questions quickly. And discord for office hours (currently Tuesday 5-7pm Pacific), stakeholder news, and upcoming new issues.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named in this issue. Start by reading the completed #4123 and the remaining #5781 to determine the current scope and implementation path; the work is done when the behavior described by #5781 is complete for supervisors, admins, and volunteers.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rails, ruby
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100