rubyforgood / rubyforgood/alongwithyou

Caregiver/Emergency Contacts — add/edit/delete list

Open
#35 4 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

phase:1 RFG Conference type:feature
Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
9
Forks
4
Avg merge
9h 34m
Merged PRs (30d)
16

Description

Description

The first Phase 1 vertical slice, chosen in
0008 because it is the simplest
true instance of the repeatable-entry pattern: four plain text fields, no
excluded-field reasoning, no derived values, no conditional logic.

This ticket and #49 are the same piece of work and are tracked together as
#118, which has the fuller specification.
Work #118. This one exists as the
Phase 1 backlog entry and should be closed with it.

Fields

Name, relationship, phone, email. (From 0008 directly.)

Acceptance Criteria
  • Add, edit and delete work end to end against the encrypted local database
  • Built on the generic component from #49, not hardcoded to these four fields
  • Ships migration 1 — MIGRATIONS is currently empty, so this is the first table in the app
  • Sits behind the biometric unlock shell
  • WCAG-aligned; one task per screen, next step obvious
  • Covered by unit tests
Additional Info and Resources
  • Duplicate of / superseded by #118 — see there for full criteria and QA
  • Output feeds the "Keep with me" screen (#48) later; keep that in mind for the data shape, but do not build it here
QA
  • See #118.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with superseding issue #118, which contains the fuller specification and QA guidance; use docs/decisions/0008-first-vertical-slice.md and issue #49 for the original context. Confirm the migration, encrypted local database, biometric shell, accessibility, and unit-test requirements there; this issue should be closed in favor of #118 rather than implemented independently.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
typescript
Domain
accessibility, authentication, database, testing
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.