rubyforgood / rubyforgood/alongwithyou
[BUG] Relationship needs to be a optional field on person
Open
Beginner friendly
Nobody has claimed this yet.
bug
RFG Conference
ruby
severity:minor
triage
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 9
- Forks
- 4
- Avg merge
- 9h 34m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 16
Description
Describe the bug
Schema has relationship indicated as required on the person model
Steps to reproduce
N/A
Expected behavior
enter person without relationship
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by locating the person model and the schema that currently marks relationship as required. Check the relevant validation or model tests, then verify that creating a person without relationship succeeds and that existing relationship behavior remains intact.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- backend
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 64/100