License?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
content
internal
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 944
- Forks
- 673
- Avg merge
- 2d 6h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 9
Description
I just noticed that we do not explicitly state what license the repository and it's content is under. I suppose we would want to use Creative Commons?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the repository and its content, then follow the linked Creative Commons chooser to clarify the licensing decision and scope. Confirm which license should cover the repository and its content, and document that choice in the appropriate project location; done means the applicable license is explicitly stated.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100