ruby / ruby/rbs

Some quick way of declarinng common signature, such as () -> void

Open
#423 0 comments 1 reaction 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Ruby
Stars
2.2k
Forks
256
Avg merge
6d 17h
Merged PRs (30d)
37

Description

There are some "state management" methods, which do not have relevant type information. Ex: a #close method on some object.

A proposal for such a syntax would be to group multiple methods for such a declaration (it could also work for other signatures):

def close, trigger, contact: () ->  void

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with issue #423 and review the existing RBS signature syntax and parser tests; the payload names no files or tests. Clarify whether grouped declarations such as def close, trigger, contact: () -> void are intended, then define the syntax and validation cases that would establish completion.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
ruby
Domain
compilers
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.