ruby / ruby/rbs

record union breaks type information

Open
#2,969 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Ruby
Stars
2.2k
Forks
256
Avg merge
6d 17h
Merged PRs (30d)
37

Description

# RBS
# type simple = { flags: Integer }

a1 = { flags: 1 } #: simple
a1[:flags] #=> steep will correctly identify this as an integer

# type not_so_simple = simple & { id: String }
a2 = {id: "abc", flags: 2 }#: not_so_simple
a2[:flags] #=> steep will think this is either a String or an Integer. this is the bug!

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by reproducing the RBS example in the issue, focusing on the intersection type simple & { id: String } and hash access for flags. Trace the type-checking path that handles the union or intersection and verify that a2[:flags] is inferred as Integer rather than String or Integer.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
ruby
Domain
tooling
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
55/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.