RFC4466 (2006): Collected Extensions to IMAP4 ABNF
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 118
- Forks
- 43
- Avg merge
- 1d 23h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 26
Description
Supporting RFC4466 as well as the basic ABNF in RFC3501 will give significant forward compatibility, allowing us to partially parse some other extensions which we don't (yet?) otherwise support. Additionally, RFC4466 support is necessary for RFC9051.
- Parse unknown or unsupported extensions using RFC4466
tagged-extsyntax- Parse
tagged-ext-val(done as part of #225) - Add
ExtensionData(done as part of #225) - #127
- #128
- #129
(also usable for non-RFC4466 extension data)
- Parse
- RFC4466 2.1: Optional Parameters with the
#select/#examineCommands- #124
- Add kwargs to
#select/#examinefor existingselect-paramextensions- #122
- #123
- RFC4466 2.2: Extended
#createCommand- #126
- Add kwargs to
#createfor existingcreate-paramextensions- #125
- RFC4466 2.3: Extended
#renameCommand- #130
- RFC4466 2.4: Extensions to
#fetchand#uid_fetchCommands- #133
- Add kwargs to
#fetch/#uid_fetchfor existingfetch-modifierextensions- #132
- #131
- RFC4422 2.6: Extensions to
#searchCommand- #115
- Add arbitrary return opts to
#search, usingsearch-return-optssyntax (RFC4466 tagged-ext)
- Add arbitrary return opts to
- #121
- #120
- Parse all existing
search-return-dataextensions directly
- #115
- RFC4422 2.7: Extensions to
#appendCommand- #535
- #537
- #536
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing RFC4466, RFC3501, and RFC9051, then inspect the outstanding linked issues (#123, #124–#131, #133, and #536–#537) to identify the remaining implementation scope. Done means the unchecked RFC4466 parsing and command-extension items in this checklist are implemented and covered by the relevant project tests.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- ruby
- Domain
- networking
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100