Make it easier to prevent Server side request forgery (SSRF) attacks
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 148
- Forks
- 95
- Avg merge
- 10h 54m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 4
Description
Over the years, we've received many bug bounty reports relating to Server side request forgery (SSRF) attacks. In a nutshell, these attacks use short-lived DNS entries to direct Web hooks and other URLs to internal IP addresses, such as AWS's instance metadata endpoint.
To a large extent, the problem is mitigated by using HTTPS, since a SSL certificate Common Name (CN) must match the hostname. However, there are a number of edge cases where HTTPS doesn't solve the issue. For example:
- DNS rebinding might still enable reconnaissance on the local network, since errors show the difference between "10.1.2.3:4567 unreachable" and "10.1.2.3:4567 reachable but TLS error".
- Some clients or Web hooks may disable SSL certificate verification.
In the past, we've mitigated the problem by:
- Performing a DNS lookup first for the IP address.
- If the IP address maps to internal or local networks, reject the request.
- If the IP address is allowed, make the HTTPS request with the IP address instead of the hostname. To ensure SNI works, we patched
net-httpto use the original hostname by overriding thehostname=method.
A similar approach is taken by ssrf_filter.
However, with https://github.com/ruby/net-http/pull/36, our net-http patch no longer works because hostname= isn't called when an IP address is used. To handle that, https://github.com/arkadiyt/ssrf_filter/pull/54 introduced an even uglier patch that overrides the Resolv equality methods.
Both hostname= and Resolv patches are a bit ugly, but short of patching the #connect method there's no alternative at the moment.
A better approach might be to invoke some callback in #connect that will allow the caller to resolve the hostname and decide whether the connection should still proceed.
I realize that others might argue that a proxying all external calls via a proxy server is ultimately the right approach, but that's another moving part that requires more setup.
@jeremyevans What do you think about this?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading net-http's #connect path and the existing hostname= handling, then compare the SSRF mitigation described in the issue with the Resolv workaround in ssrf_filter. The issue suggests a callback for hostname resolution and connection approval, but does not define a settled API or tests; done would require an agreed design and coverage for rejected internal addresses and allowed HTTPS connections.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- ruby
- Domain
- networking, security
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100