Performance issue when stepping through a deep callstack

Open
#760 4 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Newbie friendliness
30/100
Issue type
Bug
Clarity
Mostly clear
Activity status
Stale
Tech stack
c, ruby

Research direction

Start at ext/debug/debug.c lines 92-98 and inspect how rb_make_backtrace is used while stepping through a deep callstack. Compare the proposed rb_threadptr_backtrace_object and debase approaches, including their *_core.h requirements. Done means stepping through roughly 150 calls no longer incurs the reported slowdown and memory pressure.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

Your environment

  • ruby -v: 2.7.2p137
  • rdbg -v: 1.6.2

Describe the bug
When stepping through with a deep callstack, the debugger becomes slower with each step.

To Reproduce
In a codebase which has a method that's ~150 calls deep in the stack, add a breakpoint, debug, and step through.

Expected behavior
It wouldn't be slow

Additional context
We are facing this issue at Stripe, and we tracked down the problem to: https://github.com/ruby/debug/blob/296daa6742e114395a4ce336b8721d48a6e5e52f/ext/debug/debug.c#L92-L98

This seems to be generating the full backtrace through rb_make_backtrace, just to then take the size. rb_make_backtrace (source) generates an array of strings each time it's called. Those strings end up not being used, and after a couple of iterations, you end up with a big memory footprint, which causes the GC to collect them, significantly slowing down the debugger.

Luckily, it looks like you are already aware that this is inefficient (given the // TODO: more efficient API) :)

Looking into alternatives, I came up with a couple of options (but open to any other ideas):

  1. Use rb_threadptr_backtrace_object to skip the formatting of the backtrace, saving some extra memory (but still generating more than necessary)
  2. debase solves this with a different approach: https://github.com/ruby-debug/debase/blob/5780803819f16190ce50ddfdad5775acf8f95fd1/ext/hacks.h#L26

Both of them, though, require the inclusion of *_core.h, which is not currently possible (debase solves it by using its own version of ruby_core_source)

Dominant language
Ruby
Stars
1.3k
Forks
146
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from ruby/debug

All issues in ruby/debug

Similar issues

More Ruby issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.