Intended use of database pools
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 255
- Forks
- 33
- Avg merge
- 1d 12h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
While reading the documentation at https://rstudio.github.io/pool/articles/advanced-pool.html, I noticed that it might give the impression that increasing the number of connections in a database pool could help manage "spikes in traffic" (presumably in shiny or plumber applications).
However, since database pools and their underlying connections cannot be shared across process boundaries (e.g., via promise_futures), I am curious about how the intended use-case for database pools was envisioned, aside from the auto-connect feature. As far as I know, database operations (read/write) will always block. One could argue that different connections to the same database could, in theory, be checked out one after another. However, this seems to be an extremely esoteric usage pattern.
I think this information could benetif other (potential) users as well. Thx.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the advanced-pool documentation at https://rstudio.github.io/pool/articles/advanced-pool.html and review the statements about increasing connections for traffic spikes. Determine the intended use of database pools, including the process-boundary limitation raised here, then update the relevant documentation so the use case and limitations are explicit.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- r
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100