Add return type annotation to `pin_list`
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 59
- Forks
- 11
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
I think this should always be a list of strings, it would be good to indicate such since it doesn't look like LSPs like Pylance are good at inferring this through static analysis.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Locate the pin_list definition and inspect nearby type annotations to follow the project's conventions. Add the return annotation indicating a list of strings, then run the relevant test suite and confirm the annotation is exposed without changing runtime behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- api
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100