Confusion regarding visibility_control for static libraries for Windows

Looking at visibility_control.hpp (and all of these throughout the ROS2 codebase), it seems like it was never designed for static linkage on Windows. Say I don't have RCLCPP_BUILDING_LIBRARY in my preprocessor flags, RCLCPP_PUBLIC_TYPE will use __declspec(dllimport), which is probably not what you want during statically linking. Other libraries tend to just leave those defines blank --even the second example in the linked website in the header does that (https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility).

Am I missing something fundamental here? C++ isn't my strong suite, but I'm trying to get static libraries instead of shared libraries/.dlls.

Thank you!

#ifndef RCLCPP__VISIBILITY_CONTROL_HPP_
#define RCLCPP__VISIBILITY_CONTROL_HPP_

// This logic was borrowed (then namespaced) from the examples on the gcc wiki:
//     https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility

#if defined _WIN32 || defined __CYGWIN__
  #ifdef __GNUC__
    #define RCLCPP_EXPORT __attribute__ ((dllexport))
    #define RCLCPP_IMPORT __attribute__ ((dllimport))
  #else
    #define RCLCPP_EXPORT __declspec(dllexport)
    #define RCLCPP_IMPORT __declspec(dllimport)
  #endif
  #ifdef RCLCPP_BUILDING_LIBRARY
    #define RCLCPP_PUBLIC RCLCPP_EXPORT
  #else
    #define RCLCPP_PUBLIC RCLCPP_IMPORT
  #endif
  #define RCLCPP_PUBLIC_TYPE RCLCPP_PUBLIC
  #define RCLCPP_LOCAL
#else
  #define RCLCPP_EXPORT __attribute__ ((visibility("default")))
  #define RCLCPP_IMPORT
  #if __GNUC__ >= 4
    #define RCLCPP_PUBLIC __attribute__ ((visibility("default")))
    #define RCLCPP_LOCAL  __attribute__ ((visibility("hidden")))
  #else
    #define RCLCPP_PUBLIC
    #define RCLCPP_LOCAL
  #endif
  #define RCLCPP_PUBLIC_TYPE
#endif

#endif  // RCLCPP__VISIBILITY_CONTROL_HPP_