ropensci / ropensci/PostcodesioR
No CI?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 42
- Forks
- 7
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
👋 @erykwalczak!
On https://ropensci.r-universe.dev/builds we see
Codoc mismatches from Rd file 'bulk_postcode_lookup.Rd':
bulk_postcode_lookup
Code: function(..., postcodes = NULL)
Docs: function(postcodes)
Argument names in code not in docs:
...
Mismatches in argument names:
Position: 1 Code: ... Docs: postcodes
Mismatches in argument default values:
Name: 'postcodes' Code: NULL Docs:
I came here to report this but noticed there's no CI workflow in this repo. https://devguide.ropensci.org/pkg_ci.html Is there any specific reason? If not, do you need any help with CI?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Read the rOpenSci package CI guidance at devguide.ropensci.org/pkg_ci.html, then inspect the repository for its current package checks and the reported bulk_postcode_lookup.Rd mismatch. Done should mean the CI scope is agreed and the repository has an appropriate workflow that reports these package checks.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- r
- Domain
- ci-cd
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100