rocq-prover / rocq-prover/stdlib
deprecating List.nth in favor of List.nth_default
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rocq Prover
- Stars
- 42
- Forks
- 38
- Avg merge
- 14h 6m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
These definitions are equivalent on ground terms, and we should pick one to recommend so that lemmas consolidate around it unless there is a strong reason to keep both.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by examining the definitions of List.nth and List.nth_default and the lemmas that use them. Determine whether the issue calls for deprecation, recommendation, or broader lemma consolidation; done should mean the chosen API and the scope of any consolidation are explicitly agreed.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100