Shall blocks types be shadowed by plugins?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
question
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 2.5k
- Forks
- 320
- Avg merge
- 1d 14h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 133
Description
Search before asking
- I have searched the Inference issues and found no similar feature requests.
Question
Do we allow types names shadowing to enable customisation of workflows behaviour by users based on custom plugins.
Original question: https://github.com/roboflow/inference/pull/343#discussion_r1586712802
Additional
No response
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reading the discussion linked from the issue, especially the reference to pull request 343. Determine whether workflow type names may be shadowed by custom plugins, and identify the expected behavior and scope before considering implementation. Done means the project has a clear decision about plugin-based workflow customization.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100