riverqueue / riverqueue/river

Drop `river_client` + `river_client_queue`

Open
#875 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

needs db migration
Dominant language
Go
Stars
5.7k
Forks
179
Avg merge
15h 43m
Merged PRs (30d)
13

Description

These were never put to work, and unless we find a reason they should exist soon, we should drop them on the next migration, especially now that river_producer is a thing.

Contributor guide

No contributing guide indexed for this repository

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No files or tests are named. Locate the migration definitions for river_client and river_client_queue, then inspect how river_producer is represented and used. Done means the unused tables are removed in the next migration without affecting the active producer path.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
go, postgresql
Domain
databases
Issue type
Refactor
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.