Benchmarking: what is performance like when compared to conventional usage of the servers?
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 1
- Forks
- 0
- Avg merge
- 18m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
We should understand any potential performance differences between conventional usage of the quilc and qvm servers and this in-process library. We should be sure to test both single and multi-threaded workloads.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files or tests are named. Start by identifying how the in-process library exposes quilc and qvm functionality, then determine how conventional server usage can be measured alongside it for single- and multi-threaded workloads. Done means having comparable performance results for both workload types.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- performance
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100