Consider adding something about how `contains` in RethinkDB works like `in` in Mongo
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- CSS
- Stars
- 118
- Forks
- 161
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
We've had several people ask about it, we should consider adding an entry to a FAQ somewhere phrased so that it shows up when people google for "RethinkDB in operator" or "RethinkDB field in" or whatever.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the existing FAQ and the documentation for contains to find the appropriate place for a searchable entry. Add an explanation of how RethinkDB’s contains relates to Mongo’s in operator, including the relevant search terms, and confirm the wording fits the surrounding documentation.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 45/100